EN / ID
About Supra

Economic Determinants and Policy Implications of Indonesia's Waste-to-Energy Tariff Framework: Analysis of the 20 Cents USD per kWh Paradigm in Sustainable Energy Transition

Category: Waste
Date: Sep 20th 2025
Indonesia's Waste-to-Energy Policy Transformation: Danantara Strategic Leadership, Tariff Framework Reform, and National Waste Crisis Response in 2025

Reading Time: 19 minutes



Key Highlights

Danantara Central Coordination: Indonesia's sovereign wealth fund Danantara designated as primary coordinating entity for 33 waste-to-energy strategic projects, with government completing regulatory framework in Government Regulation form (September 2025).


Tariff Framework Revision: Proposed Presidential Regulation increases electricity tariff for Waste-to-Energy Power Plants to 22 US cents per kWh from previous 13 US cents per kWh, with tipping fee scheme elimination improving project economics (August-September 2025).


Escalating Waste Crisis: Indonesia's waste generation projected to reach 82 million tons annually by 2045, with current 35 million tons production facing 61% unmanaged rate, requiring urgent infrastructure transformation.


Multi-City Implementation: Jakarta, Bandung, Bali, Semarang, Surabaya, and Makassar identified as priority cities ready for transparent WTE project tendering, with focus on cities generating over 1,000 tons daily waste.



Executive Summary

Indonesia's waste-to-energy sector transformation accelerated dramatically in 2025 as coordinated government policy reforms, sovereign wealth fund Danantara's strategic leadership, and revised financial frameworks converged to address the nation's escalating waste crisis. Universitas Gadjah Mada research published March 2025 projects Indonesian waste generation reaching 82 million tons annually by 2045, more than doubling current production levels.[6] Current data indicates Indonesia generates approximately 35 million tons of waste annually with more than 61% remaining unmanaged through proper systems, creating environmental contamination, public health risks, and greenhouse gas emissions from inadequate disposal practices.


The government's response encompasses comprehensive policy restructuring including Danantara's designation as primary coordinating entity for 33 waste-to-energy strategic projects, proposed tariff increases to 22 US cents per kWh creating economically viable project frameworks, and elimination of tipping fee structures that previously created fiscal burdens for regional governments.[2] Director General of New, Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation at Ministry of ESDM stated September 1, 2025 that all WTE proposals will first go through Danantara, which will determine whether projects will be carried out by private companies or Danantara itself, with involvement potentially in financial support or joint venture mechanisms.


Danantara CEO Rosan P. Roeslani announced September 4, 2025 that WTE regulations in Government Regulation form have been completed with tender processes to begin soon for priority cities including Jakarta, Bandung, Bali, Semarang, Surabaya, and Makassar.[3] This policy convergence represents Indonesia's most comprehensive approach to date for addressing waste management challenges while advancing renewable energy objectives aligned with national development targets including 100% waste management by 2029 and Net Zero Emission goals by 2060.


Indonesia's Waste Crisis: Scale and Projections

Indonesia confronts a waste management crisis of extraordinary scale requiring transformative infrastructure solutions beyond traditional landfill-dependent approaches. Research from Universitas Gadjah Mada's Center for Energy Studies projects that Indonesian waste generation will reach 82 million tons annually by 2045, representing more than doubling of current production levels.[6] This projection reflects combined effects of population growth, urbanization acceleration, rising consumption patterns, and insufficient waste reduction interventions at source generation points.


Current waste generation indicates national production of approximately 35 million tons annually, with more than 61% lacking proper management systems through formal collection, processing, or disposal infrastructure. This unmanaged waste proportion creates multiple cascading problems including environmental contamination through informal dumping, public health risks from inadequate disposal practices, greenhouse gas emissions from decomposing organic matter, and aesthetic degradation affecting community quality of life. The concentration of waste generation in urban areas, particularly Java's major cities, exacerbates infrastructure strain where population density and limited available land create acute management challenges.


Mongabay investigative reporting from July 2025 documents how Indonesian cities struggle with fundamental waste management challenges through informal practices including open burning, inadequate burial, and attempted bans on waste generation that prove unenforceable without alternative disposal infrastructure.[7] The analysis highlights systemic failures where municipal governments lack technical capacity, financial resources, or institutional coordination necessary for modern waste management systems meeting environmental and public health standards.


Indonesian Waste Crisis Dimensions:

Current Generation Patterns (2025):
• 35 million tons annual national waste production
• 61% unmanaged waste lacking proper collection and disposal
• Major urban centers generating over 1,000 tons daily
• Concentration in Java creating acute regional pressures
• Environmental contamination from informal dumping
• Public health risks from inadequate disposal practices

Future Projections and Drivers:
• 82 million tons annual generation projected by 2045
• More than doubling of current production within two decades
• Population growth and urbanization acceleration
• Rising consumption patterns driving waste increases
• Infrastructure requirements far exceeding current capacity
• Need for transformative solutions beyond traditional landfills

Landfill Limitations and Environmental Impacts:
• Increasing land scarcity for new landfill development
• Environmental contamination risks from inadequate facilities
• Methane emissions contributing to climate change
• Social conflicts with communities opposing new sites
• Many existing facilities operating beyond design capacity

 


Danantara's Strategic Coordination Framework

Danantara's designation as primary coordinating entity for waste-to-energy projects represents fundamental restructuring of Indonesian infrastructure governance, leveraging sovereign wealth fund capabilities for complex multi-stakeholder coordination. Danantara CEO Rosan P. Roeslani stated September 4, 2025 at House of Representatives hearings that the institution has prepared 33 strategic projects with waste-to-energy as key priority area, with WTE regulations in Government Regulation form completed and tender processes to begin soon for priority cities.[3]


Director General Eniya Listiani Dewi's September 1, 2025 statement clarifies Danantara's selection authority, noting that all WTE proposals will first go through Danantara for project determination regarding implementation models.[2] This centralized screening enables consistent evaluation of technical feasibility, financial viability, environmental impacts, and regional priorities across diverse proposals from different cities and developer groups. Danantara's evaluation process considers whether projects should be carried out by private companies, Danantara directly, or through joint venture structures combining public and private capabilities.


The priority city selection reflects pragmatic targeting of locations where waste generation volumes, existing infrastructure capacity, institutional readiness, and political commitment create favorable conditions for successful WTE project implementation. Cities generating over 1,000 tons daily waste provide sufficient feedstock volumes for economically viable WTE facilities while their acute waste management challenges create local government motivation for supporting project implementation. Geographic diversity across priority cities enables demonstration of WTE viability across different regional contexts.


Regulatory Framework and Tariff Reform

Significant regulatory restructuring in August-September 2025 consolidates previously fragmented policy frameworks while establishing economically viable tariff structures essential for attracting private investment in WTE infrastructure. Indonesia Business Post reported August 27, 2025 that Indonesian government plans to issue new Presidential Regulation replacing three existing regulations on waste management, with consolidation intended to streamline permitting procedures, clarify institutional responsibilities, and create consistent policy frameworks applicable across different regions and project types.[4]


The proposed Presidential Regulation's most significant financial innovation involves electricity tariff increases to 22 US cents per kWh from previous 13 US cents per kWh. This 69% tariff increase substantially improves project economics by ensuring revenues cover capital costs, operating expenses, and reasonable returns on investment necessary for attracting commercial financing. Previous 13 cent tariffs proved insufficient for many WTE project configurations, particularly those employing advanced emission control technologies or operating in regions with complex logistics creating elevated costs.


The elimination of tipping fee structures represents equally important reform addressing fiscal sustainability challenges in previous frameworks. Under previous arrangements, regional governments bore obligations to pay tipping fees to WTE operators for waste processing services, creating municipal budget pressures that proved difficult to sustain. The reformed framework consolidates payments through PLN (state electricity utility), leveraging the utility's strong creditworthiness and established payment systems while eliminating transaction costs associated with bilateral negotiations between operators and multiple regional governments.


Tariff Framework Reform Details:

Previous Framework Limitations:
• 13 US cents per kWh electricity tariff insufficient for viability
• Tipping fee obligations creating fiscal burdens for regional governments
• Split payment streams between PLN and municipal authorities
• Payment uncertainties undermining project bankability
• Regional government budget constraints affecting fee payments

Proposed Framework Improvements:
• 22 US cents per kWh electricity tariff improving project economics
• 69% tariff increase addressing capital and operating cost coverage
• Elimination of tipping fee requirements
• Unified payment structure through PLN
• Ministry of Finance subsidy mechanisms for tariff differentials
• Enhanced project bankability attracting commercial financing

Economic Impact:
• Improved returns on investment for private developers
• Reduced fiscal burden on municipal governments
• Simplified revenue structures eliminating bilateral negotiations
• Greater investor confidence from state utility creditworthiness
• Enhanced access to financing for project development

 


National Waste Management Transformation Strategy

Indonesia unveiled comprehensive strategy to transform national waste management through coordinated approaches addressing financing, institutional capacity, technology deployment, and regulatory frameworks.[5] The transformation strategy recognizes that achieving universal waste management requires systematic interventions beyond infrastructure construction alone, encompassing institutional development at national and subnational levels, financing mechanisms appropriate to diverse municipal capacities, technical assistance supporting technology selection and operations, and regulatory frameworks creating consistent requirements while allowing regional adaptation.


The strategy's financing dimension acknowledges that municipal governments alone cannot fund required infrastructure investments, necessitating central government support through budget allocations, guarantees enabling commercial financing, blended finance structures combining public and private capital, and potentially international climate finance recognizing waste management's climate mitigation co-benefits. Danantara's involvement provides sophisticated financing capabilities including project finance structuring, risk assessment and mitigation, public-private partnership design, and access to domestic and international capital markets.


Technology selection within the transformation strategy emphasizes appropriate solutions for different waste stream characteristics and regional conditions. Waste-to-energy facilities target high-volume urban waste streams where combustible materials and generation density support economically viable operations. Composting and biological treatment processes address organic waste diversion from landfills while generating soil amendments. Material recovery facilities enable recycling of valuable materials supporting circular economy objectives while reducing extraction of virgin resources.


Expert Perspectives on Implementation

IESR Director Fabby Tumiwa stated September 26, 2025 that continuing traditional landfill development raises concerns about regional land availability while creating new public health problems for surrounding communities.[1] Tumiwa's analysis emphasizes that landfill expansion cannot sustainably address Indonesia's growing waste volumes given land constraints in urban areas, environmental contamination risks from inadequate facility design or operations, methane emissions contributing to climate change, and persistent social conflicts when communities oppose new landfill siting.


Tumiwa noted that waste-to-energy project acceleration has been on government agenda since previous administrations, indicating longstanding policy interest that faced implementation barriers preventing significant deployment. The high costs of waste-to-energy conversion require significant government financial backing according to expert statements, as the entire value chain from waste collection and processing to energy generation and electricity sales requires substantial capital investment beyond typical municipal government budgets.


Technology standardization emerges as critical requirement for preventing environmental contamination risks while enabling operational expertise development and maintenance capabilities. Without appropriate technology standards, WTE facilities could employ inadequate emission control systems, operate under suboptimal parameters allowing pollution releases, or utilize designs inappropriate for Indonesian waste characteristics and climatic conditions. Government technical standards establishing minimum performance requirements and approved technology lists create frameworks supporting responsible WTE deployment.


Climate Change Mitigation and Energy Transition

Waste-to-energy infrastructure advancement aligns with Indonesia's climate change mitigation commitments including Net Zero Emission targets by 2060 and intermediate emissions reduction goals. The climate benefits operate through multiple mechanisms including methane emission prevention by diverting organic waste from landfills where anaerobic decomposition generates potent greenhouse gas, renewable electricity generation displacing fossil fuel consumption in power systems, and potential for district heating or cooling applications utilizing waste heat from combustion processes.


Landfill methane represents substantial portion of Indonesian national greenhouse gas emissions, significant proportion addressable through waste management transformation including organic waste diversion and WTE deployment. The methane prevention benefits prove particularly valuable as methane's global warming potential exceeds carbon dioxide on near-term timeframes relevant to achieving 2030 and 2050 climate targets. Preventing methane generation through alternative waste management approaches therefore delivers disproportionate climate benefits relative to the tonnage of waste addressed.


Renewable energy contribution from WTE facilities provides valuable baseload generation capacity complementing variable renewable sources including solar and wind. Unlike solar panels generating only during daylight or wind turbines requiring adequate wind conditions, WTE plants can operate continuously providing stable electricity output supporting grid reliability. This baseload characteristic proves particularly valuable as Indonesia pursues aggressive renewable energy expansion requiring portfolio approaches balancing variable and dispatchable generation technologies.


Climate and Energy Benefits of WTE Infrastructure:

Emissions Reduction Mechanisms:
• Methane prevention through landfill waste diversion
• Fossil fuel displacement in electricity generation
• Reduced transportation emissions from optimized waste logistics
• Potential utilization of waste heat for district energy
• Material recovery reducing virgin resource extraction

Renewable Energy Contribution:
• Baseload renewable electricity generation capability
• Contribution to national renewable energy targets
• Grid stability benefits from dispatchable generation
• Local energy security for host communities
• Technology demonstration for broader energy transition

National Climate Commitments:
• Net Zero Emission 2060 target alignment
• Nationally Determined Contributions implementation
• RPJMN integration with climate objectives
• International climate finance eligibility
• Technology transfer and capacity building opportunities

Circular Economy Principles:
• Waste valorization as energy resource
• Material recovery before energy conversion
• Residue utilization in construction applications
• Integration with recycling and composting systems

 


Investment Climate and Private Sector Participation

The reformed policy framework aims to create favorable investment climate attracting domestic and international private capital to Indonesian WTE sector. The combination of enhanced revenues through 22 cent tariffs, reduced complexity through tipping fee elimination, and improved payment security through PLN centralized arrangements substantially improves project economics and reduces execution risks that deterred previous investments. Publicly listed Indonesian companies represent potential beneficiaries of expanded WTE opportunities according to securities analyst assessments.


International technology providers and project developers represent additional investor categories attracted by Indonesian market scale and improved policy frameworks. Companies with proven WTE technology platforms, international project development experience, and access to competitive financing can partner with Indonesian entities through joint ventures, technical assistance agreements, or equipment supply contracts participating in market development. Danantara's coordinating role potentially facilitates these international partnerships by providing credible counterparty for negotiations, technical evaluation capability, and government backing.


Community engagement and social license prove essential for successful WTE implementation given historical patterns of community opposition to waste facilities. Transparent siting processes, comprehensive environmental impact assessments, meaningful community consultation, benefit-sharing arrangements with host communities, and rigorous environmental monitoring with public disclosure build trust necessary for project acceptance. Danantara's coordinating role potentially facilitates these engagement processes by providing neutral convening capability and technical expertise for addressing community concerns.


Implementation Timeline and Near-Term Priorities

Danantara CEO Rosan P. Roeslani's September 4, 2025 statement that WTE regulations in Government Regulation form have been completed indicates imminent commencement of formal tender processes for priority cities. The completion of regulatory frameworks removes major uncertainty that previously hindered project advancement, enabling developers to finalize project designs, secure financing commitments, and submit competitive proposals within established regulatory parameters.[8]


Priority city identification enables focused implementation rather than dispersed efforts across numerous locations potentially exceeding available institutional capacity and financial resources. Jakarta, Bandung, Bali, Semarang, Surabaya, and Makassar represent strategic selection balancing geographic diversity, demonstration of feasibility across different contexts, and targeting of locations where success probability remains highest due to favorable preconditions. Successful implementation in these priority cities creates demonstration effects, operational learning, and confidence building supporting subsequent expansion.


Capacity building initiatives supporting implementation success require parallel attention alongside physical infrastructure development. Training programs for regulatory personnel enable effective project oversight, technical assistance to municipal governments builds local implementation capacity, knowledge transfer from international experience accelerates learning curves, and development of domestic WTE operations expertise creates sustainable long-term capabilities. Monitoring and accountability mechanisms ensure that policy objectives translate into actual outcomes through transparent performance measurement and public reporting.


Strategic Outlook and Conclusions

Indonesia's waste-to-energy policy transformation in 2025 represents convergence of long-developing elements including escalating waste crisis recognition, regulatory framework maturation, sovereign wealth fund institutional capabilities, and financial structure reforms creating viable project economics. The combination of Danantara's strategic coordination role, proposed tariff increases to 22 US cents per kWh, tipping fee elimination simplifying payment structures, and regulatory consolidation streamlining permitting creates comprehensive enabling environment for accelerated WTE deployment.


The urgency driving these policy reforms reflects Indonesia's waste generation trajectory projected to reach 82 million tons annually by 2045, more than doubling current 35 million ton production with majority remaining unmanaged through proper systems. Traditional landfill-dependent approaches prove increasingly unsustainable given land constraints, environmental contamination risks, climate change impacts from methane emissions, and social conflicts surrounding facility siting. WTE infrastructure offers alternative pathway addressing waste volumes while generating renewable electricity and avoiding landfill emissions.


Danantara's designation as primary coordinating entity provides institutional framework potentially overcoming fragmentation that hindered previous WTE initiatives. Near-term implementation focusing on priority cities enables demonstration of WTE viability across diverse Indonesian contexts while concentrating resources on locations with highest success probability. Achievement of national development targets including 100% waste management by 2029 and Net Zero Emission by 2060 depends partly on successful WTE deployment as component of integrated strategies addressing waste, energy, and climate objectives simultaneously.


References

1. Indonesia Business Post (September 26, 2025). Indonesia urged to accelerate waste-to-energy projects.
https://indonesiabusinesspost.com/5329/society-environment-and-culture/indonesia-urged-to-accelerate-waste-to-energy-projects


2. Tempo (September 1, 2025). Danantara's Role in Indonesia's Waste-to-Energy Power Plant Project.
https://en.tempo.co/amp/2045320/danantaras-role-in-indonesias-waste-to-energy-power-plant-project


3. Indonesia Business Post (September 4, 2025). Danantara prepares 33 strategic projects, waste-to-energy as key.
https://indonesiabusinesspost.com/5160/corporate-affairs/danantara-prepares-33-strategic-projects-waste-to-energy-as-key


4. Indonesia Business Post (August 27, 2025). Govt to issue new presidential regulation on waste management.
https://indonesiabusinesspost.com/5104/energy-and-resources/govt-to-issue-new-presidential-regulation-on-waste-management-for-energy-sector-development


5. ANTARA News (September 2025). Indonesia unveils strategy to transform national waste management.
https://en.antaranews.com/news/381225/indonesia-unveils-strategy-to-transform-national-waste-management


6. Universitas Gadjah Mada (March 2025). Indonesia Faces Waste Crisis, Projected to Generate 82 Million Tons by 2045.
https://ugm.ac.id/en/news/indonesia-faces-waste-crisis-projected-to-generate-82-million-tons-by-2045/


7. Mongabay (July 2025). Burning, burying and banning: Indonesia's cities struggle to manage their garbage.
https://news.mongabay.com/2025/07/burning-burying-and-banning-indonesias-cities-struggle-to-manage-their-garbage/


8. Petromindo News (September 2025). Danantara plans 33 waste-to-energy projects, awaits regulatory revision.
https://www.petromindo.com/news/article/danantara-plans-33-waste-to-energy-projects-awaits-regulatory-revision



SUPRA International

Waste-to-Energy Project Development and Policy Advisory

SUPRA International provides comprehensive consulting services for waste-to-energy project development, feasibility studies, regulatory compliance, and policy analysis. Our team supports government agencies, project developers, and investors across WTE technology selection, environmental impact assessment, financial modeling, stakeholder engagement, and implementation strategy for sustainable waste management infrastructure.


Need expert guidance on waste-to-energy project development and policy frameworks?
Contact us to discuss your WTE implementation strategy and regulatory compliance requirements



Share:

← Previous Next →

If you face challenges in water, waste, or energy, whether it is system reliability, regulatory compliance, efficiency, or cost control, SUPRA is here to support you. When you connect with us, our experts will have a detailed discussion to understand your specific needs and determine which phase of the full-lifecycle delivery model fits your project best.