Moving Toward Data-Driven Water Utilities in Indonesia: Current Reality, Untapped Potential, and Strategic Pathways Forward

Reading Time: 29 minutes

Executive Summary

Indonesia's water utility sector faces a critical transformation moment where traditional manual operations must shift toward data-driven management to address systemic inefficiencies affecting 275 million citizens. The 380 regional water utilities (PDAMs) across the archipelago operate with varying levels of digital maturity, yet only 45 utilities have implemented comprehensive digital data management systems.^[1] This digital gap contributes to water losses averaging 33% nationally, creating IDR 15.7 trillion in annual economic waste that advanced analytics could substantially reduce through better leak detection, pressure management, and network optimization.^[10]

The regulatory environment increasingly favors digital adoption, with BPPSPAM performance standards and Ministry of Public Works digitization policies creating clear incentives for modernization.^[5] Data-driven utilities consistently achieve superior performance ratings that determine access to development funding and government support programs. Meanwhile, manual operations face mounting pressure from growing urban populations, aging infrastructure, and rising customer expectations for reliable service. The technology investment opportunity spans IDR 28-45 trillion across the sector, with smart water management systems promising 25-35% operational cost reduction while improving service quality and financial sustainability.^[11]

Implementation challenges remain significant, with 68% of PDAMs lacking sufficient internal capabilities for digital transformation. Technical capacity limitations, infrastructure investment requirements averaging IDR 2.5-4.8 billion per utility, and organizational change management needs create barriers that require external support and strategic partnerships. Successful transitions demand phased approaches combining technology deployment, capacity building, and performance measurement over 24-48 month periods. This analysis examines current adoption patterns, assesses transformation potential, identifies key implementation barriers, and outlines strategic approaches for sustainable data-driven utility modernization that enhances performance and citizen service delivery across Indonesia's water sector.^[13]

Indonesia's Water Utility Landscape: Current State and Digital Maturity

The Indonesian water sector operates through a decentralized model where 380 regional water utilities (PDAMs) serve local populations with significant autonomy in management and operations. This structure creates diverse performance outcomes, with leading utilities in major cities achieving international standards while smaller operators struggle with basic service delivery. BPPSPAM assessments reveal stark disparities in digital maturity across this landscape.^[1] Only 45 PDAMs have implemented comprehensive digital data management systems, representing just 12% of the total. Another 224 utilities maintain partial digital capabilities, often limited to billing systems or customer databases, while 111 operators rely primarily on manual processes for most operations.

Geographic distribution of digital capabilities concentrates heavily in Java-Bali, where 78% of advanced digital utilities operate. This concentration reflects broader economic development patterns and access to technical expertise, infrastructure, and investment capital.^[2] Eastern provinces including Papua, Maluku, and Nusa Tenggara maintain predominantly manual systems due to infrastructure limitations and technical capacity constraints. Urban utilities generally demonstrate higher digital maturity than rural counterparts, creating service delivery disparities where city residents access modern digital services while rural populations receive basic manual operations with limited reliability.

Leading performers such as PDAM Surabaya, PDAM DKI Jakarta, and PDAM Bandung invest 3-5% of annual revenue in digital infrastructure while achieving superior operational outcomes. These utilities maintain non-revenue water levels below 20%, resolve customer complaints within 24 hours, and employ real-time network monitoring for proactive maintenance.^[21] Their digital systems integrate billing, customer service, asset management, and operational monitoring into unified platforms supporting data-driven decision making. The operational cost reduction achieved through automation, predictive maintenance, and process efficiency ranges from 25-35%, demonstrating clear financial benefits from digital investment.

Regulatory Framework and Policy Environment

Indonesia's regulatory framework for water utilities increasingly emphasizes performance measurement and digital capabilities as essential elements of modern utility management. BPPSPAM, established through Ministerial Regulation No. 294/2005, serves as the national support institution for water utility development with authority to set performance standards and conduct regular assessments.^[1] The agency's performance indicators include operational efficiency, financial sustainability, service quality, and increasingly, digital system implementation as factors determining utility health status ratings.

Ministry of Public Works and Housing regulations further strengthen digital adoption incentives through Ministerial Regulation No. 3/2024 and related policies establishing technical standards for water utility operations.^[6] These regulations mandate specific data collection, reporting, and performance monitoring requirements that effectively require digital systems for compliance at scale. Standard operating procedures outlined in Ministerial Regulation No. 4/2020 establish detailed operational protocols where digital documentation and real-time monitoring become practical necessities for utilities serving large populations.^[7]

The performance-based approach creates tangible consequences for digital adoption levels. Utilities achieving "Healthy" status through BPPSPAM assessments gain preferential access to government development funding, low-interest loans, and technical assistance programs. Data-driven operators consistently score higher on operational efficiency, financial management, and service quality metrics that determine these ratings. Conversely, utilities maintaining manual operations often remain trapped in "Less Healthy" or "Sick" categories, limiting their access to capital and support needed for improvement. Government funding programs worth IDR 125 trillion allocated through 2030 for water sector development increasingly require documented performance improvements that digital systems enable.^[4]

Economic Impact of Water Losses and Digital Solutions

Non-revenue water represents the most significant economic challenge facing Indonesian water utilities, averaging 33% nationally and reaching 50% or higher in poorly performing systems. This translates to IDR 15.7 trillion in annual economic waste from water produced but not billed, combining physical losses through leaks and administrative losses from billing inaccuracies, theft, and meter errors.^[10] The financial impact extends beyond direct revenue loss to include wasted energy for pumping, chemical treatment costs, and opportunity costs of foregone service expansion that missing revenues could fund.

International benchmarks and regional best practices demonstrate that comprehensive digital systems can reduce non-revenue water from Indonesian averages to 18-22% levels through better leak detection, pressure management, and billing accuracy. Advanced metering infrastructure with real-time monitoring enables rapid leak identification and repair, reducing physical losses substantially. Smart meters eliminate meter reading errors and provide consumption analytics revealing unusual patterns indicating leaks or theft. Network optimization using real-time pressure and flow data minimizes stress on aging pipes while maintaining adequate service levels across distribution systems.^[12]

The value recovery potential from reducing non-revenue water through digital solutions ranges from IDR 15.7 trillion to IDR 23.4 trillion annually across the national system. This calculation assumes moderate digital implementation achieving 40-60% reduction in water losses from current levels. For individual utilities, the revenue improvement can transform financial sustainability, enabling self-funded infrastructure improvements and service expansion previously impossible due to cash flow constraints. Smart metering alone provides 15-25% billing accuracy improvement while enabling dynamic pricing and demand management programs that optimize revenue and resource utilization.^[20]

Energy cost reduction represents another significant economic benefit from data-driven operations. Water utilities consume substantial electricity for pumping, accounting for 30-40% of operational costs in typical systems. Network optimization algorithms using real-time pressure, flow, and demand data enable 20-30% energy cost reduction through optimized pump scheduling and pressure management. These systems automatically adjust pumping operations based on actual demand patterns, tank levels, and electricity pricing, minimizing energy consumption while maintaining service reliability. The environmental benefit from reduced energy consumption aligns with national climate goals while improving utility financial performance.^[11]

Technological Architecture for Modern Water Utilities

Modern data-driven water utilities require integrated technology platforms combining customer information systems, network monitoring capabilities, asset management databases, and analytics engines. Cloud-based infrastructure provides scalability and cost-effectiveness while reducing internal IT maintenance requirements. This architecture enables automatic system updates, security patches, and backup services essential for sustained performance and cybersecurity protection without extensive internal technical staff.^[12]

IoT sensor networks form the operational backbone, providing real-time data collection across distribution systems. These sensors monitor flow rates, pressure levels, water quality parameters, and equipment performance metrics enabling proactive management throughout network operations. Sensor deployment strategies must balance comprehensive monitoring with cost-effectiveness and operational simplicity, considering maintenance accessibility, communication reliability, and power supply requirements. Leading utilities deploy sensors at critical network points including source points, major transmission mains, district metering areas, and critical customer connections, creating visibility into system performance without requiring sensors at every location.^[21]

SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) systems integrate sensor data, control equipment remotely, and provide real-time operational visibility to utility managers. Modern SCADA platforms incorporate GIS (Geographic Information System) integration, mapping network infrastructure and sensor locations while visualizing data spatially for better decision making. This combination enables operators to quickly identify problem locations, coordinate field responses, and optimize system performance based on comprehensive operational awareness.^[24] Advanced systems include automated control capabilities where algorithms adjust pumps, valves, and other equipment based on preset parameters and real-time conditions without manual intervention.

Data analytics capabilities span multiple sophistication levels, from basic descriptive reporting for regulatory compliance to advanced prescriptive optimization for operational decision support. Machine learning algorithms analyze historical patterns while identifying anomalies, forecasting demand, and recommending operational adjustments. These systems learn from past performance, adapting recommendations as conditions change and new data accumulates. The analytics layer transforms raw sensor and operational data into actionable insights supporting better decisions across maintenance planning, resource allocation, and strategic investments.^[20]

Implementation Challenges and Barriers

Technical capacity represents the most critical barrier to digital transformation, with 68% of Indonesian PDAMs lacking internal IT expertise required for digital system deployment, operation, and maintenance. The water sector traditionally attracts civil engineers and operations specialists rather than IT professionals, creating a workforce gap as utilities attempt digital transitions. Existing staff require comprehensive training in data management, analytics interpretation, and digital system operation while utilities simultaneously must recruit specialized technical personnel. These IT specialists command premium salaries exceeding traditional water sector compensation ranges, creating recruitment challenges for public utilities operating under civil service pay scales.^[14]

Infrastructure investment requirements average IDR 2.5-4.8 billion per utility for comprehensive digital transformation including smart meters, network sensors, data management systems, and communication infrastructure. Many PDAMs struggle with basic operational funding and lack access to capital financing required for technology deployment. The business case for digital investment, while compelling in theory, requires upfront capital that utilities cannot self-finance from current operations. Cost-benefit analysis complexity increases implementation difficulty where utilities must evaluate multiple technology options, vendor proposals, and financing arrangements while lacking internal technical expertise for informed decision making.^[23]

Organizational change management challenges encompass staff resistance to new processes, operational disruption during system deployment, and cultural transformation from reactive to data-driven decision making. Long-tenured employees comfortable with manual processes may resist digital systems perceived as threatening job security or requiring uncomfortable learning. Leadership must navigate these human dynamics while maintaining service continuity during transitions. The shift from experience-based decision making to data-driven approaches challenges traditional hierarchies where seniority and field experience previously determined authority. Building data literacy across the organization requires sustained training investment and cultural reinforcement beyond initial system deployment.^[19]

Legacy system integration creates additional complexity where new digital platforms must interface with existing billing, customer, and operational systems while maintaining service continuity and data integrity throughout transition periods. Many utilities operate a patchwork of systems accumulated over decades, with incompatible data formats and limited integration capabilities. Replacing all systems simultaneously proves prohibitively expensive and risky, but maintaining multiple disconnected platforms defeats the purpose of digital transformation. Phased migration strategies require careful planning to ensure data flows between old and new systems while gradually expanding digital capabilities without service disruption or data loss.

Cybersecurity considerations add implementation complexity where digital systems create new vulnerability points requiring specialized security measures, staff training, and ongoing monitoring. Water utilities represent critical infrastructure, making them potential targets for cyberattacks seeking to disrupt services or access sensitive customer data. Most PDAMs currently lack cybersecurity expertise and robust protection measures beyond basic firewalls and password policies. Digital transformation requires implementing comprehensive security frameworks including network segmentation, encryption, access controls, intrusion detection, and regular security audits. These requirements add cost and complexity while demanding specialized expertise that utilities struggle to develop or procure.^[25]

Phased Implementation Strategy and Roadmap

Successful data-driven transformation requires systematic phased implementation spanning 24-48 months with clear milestone achievements and performance measurement supporting sustained organizational change. Attempting comprehensive digital transformation in a single step creates excessive risk and disruption while overwhelming organizations with insufficient technical capacity. The phased approach enables learning, adjustment, and confidence building as utilities progress through increasingly sophisticated digital capabilities.^[13]

Phase 1 focuses on digital foundation establishment over 6-9 months, including data management platform deployment, staff training initiation, and pilot system testing across limited service areas. This phase creates proof-of-concept validation and organizational learning before full-scale implementation. Utilities typically select one district or zone for pilot deployment, implementing smart meters, basic sensors, and integrated software platforms. The pilot enables testing technology performance, refining processes, and demonstrating benefits to skeptical staff and stakeholders. Success metrics for Phase 1 include system reliability, data accuracy, staff capability development, and initial performance improvements in the pilot area.^[22]

Phase 2 encompasses core system deployment across 12-18 months, expanding successful pilot implementations to additional service areas while deploying customer management platforms, billing system integration, and operational monitoring capabilities. This phase creates immediate operational improvements building internal confidence for continued investment throughout remaining implementation stages. Utilities establish standard operating procedures for data-driven operations, formalize roles and responsibilities for digital systems, and integrate technology into daily workflows. Staff training programs expand from initial technical users to broader operational and customer service teams. Phase 2 typically delivers measurable non-revenue water reduction, billing accuracy improvement, and customer satisfaction gains that validate investment decisions.^[19]

Phase 3 emphasizes advanced analytics deployment, predictive maintenance system activation, and comprehensive performance dashboard implementation over 6-12 months. This phase moves beyond basic digitization to sophisticated data-driven optimization requiring mature technical capabilities and organizational readiness. Analytics platforms process historical data to identify patterns, forecast future conditions, and recommend operational improvements. Predictive maintenance systems analyze equipment performance data to schedule interventions before failures occur, extending asset lifecycles while reducing emergency repairs. Integration with external systems including regulatory reporting platforms, government databases, and regional utility networks creates collaborative opportunities supporting compliance and benchmarking activities.

Partnership Models and Financing Approaches

Partnership strategies combining international technology providers with local implementation specialists offer optimal approaches for Indonesian utilities pursuing digital transformation. International vendors bring proven solutions, extensive experience, and cutting-edge capabilities developed through global implementations. However, they often lack deep understanding of Indonesian regulatory requirements, local operating conditions, and cultural dynamics affecting implementation success. Local partners provide market knowledge, language capabilities, and ongoing support proximity essential for sustained system performance. The combination creates stronger implementations than either partner could deliver independently.^[12]

Public-private partnerships enable risk sharing while accessing specialized expertise and financing resources not available through traditional utility procurement approaches. These arrangements can structure vendor responsibilities to include not just system delivery but performance guarantees and ongoing optimization support. Utilities maintain ownership and operational control while benefiting from private sector efficiency and innovation. Performance-based contracts align vendor incentives with utility success, creating shared motivation for optimal outcomes rather than just system delivery.^[23]

Development bank financing through institutions like Asian Development Bank and World Bank provides favorable terms for utility modernization projects while requiring documented performance improvement commitments and implementation milestone achievements. These institutions offer lower interest rates, longer repayment periods, and technical assistance supporting successful implementation. Government grant programs through Ministry of Public Works and BPPSPAM support qualifying utilities meeting specific criteria including demonstrated commitment to improvement and readiness for digital transformation. Commercial bank financing remains available for utilities with sufficient creditworthiness and collateral capacity, though typically at higher costs than development financing.^[14]

Performance-based financing models align payment schedules with achievement milestones, creating shared risk between utilities and technology providers while ensuring system deployment delivers promised benefits before full payment completion. These arrangements reduce utility financial exposure while incentivizing vendor performance and ongoing support quality throughout implementation and initial operation periods. Revenue sharing arrangements represent alternative financing approaches where vendors invest in system deployment while receiving percentage of operational savings and performance improvements over multi-year periods. These models reduce initial capital requirements while ensuring vendor commitment to long-term system performance and utility success beyond initial deployment.

Success Factors and Best Practices from Leading Utilities

Leading Indonesian water utilities that successfully implemented data-driven operations share common success factors providing valuable guidance for utilities beginning digital transformation journeys. Strong leadership commitment emerges as the most critical factor, where utility directors champion digital initiatives, communicate vision clearly, and maintain support through implementation challenges. Leadership must counter resistance, secure resources, and sustain organizational focus over multi-year transformation periods. Without visible, sustained leadership commitment, digital initiatives often falter as priorities shift and obstacles accumulate.^[21]

Comprehensive change management addressing human and organizational elements proves equally important as technical implementation. Successful utilities invest significant resources in staff communication, training, and engagement throughout transformation processes. They create digital champions within departments, celebrate early wins, and demonstrate tangible benefits motivating continued support. Performance incentives align staff interests with digital success, rewarding employees who embrace new systems and contribute to improvement. Change management continues beyond initial implementation as organizations adapt to data-driven decision making and continuous improvement cultures replacing traditional reactive operations.^[19]

Phased implementation starting with manageable pilot projects builds confidence and capabilities before full-scale deployment. Leading utilities test technologies in limited areas, refine processes based on experience, and scale gradually as skills develop and benefits materialize. This approach reduces risk while creating organizational learning and buy-in that support broader implementation. Strategic technology selection balances cutting-edge capabilities with proven reliability and vendor support. The most advanced technology does not always prove optimal for utilities with limited technical capacity. Successful implementations prioritize reliability, vendor support quality, and system simplicity enabling effective operation with available skills rather than maximum theoretical capabilities.

Data governance frameworks establishing clear ownership, quality standards, and security protocols ensure digital systems deliver reliable information supporting good decisions. Poor data quality undermines analytics and decision support regardless of technology sophistication. Leading utilities implement data validation processes, regular audits, and accountability for data accuracy across the organization. They establish clear protocols for data access, sharing, and protection ensuring security while enabling appropriate use. Performance measurement tied to strategic objectives maintains focus on outcomes rather than technology for its own sake. Successful utilities define clear success metrics before implementation, track progress regularly, and adjust strategies based on results rather than just deploying systems without measuring impact.

Regional and International Best Practice Examples

Singapore's Public Utilities Board demonstrates comprehensive digital water utility implementation through its Smart Water Grid and intelligent operations. The system integrates real-time monitoring across the entire water network, predictive analytics for maintenance and operations, and customer engagement platforms enabling consumption awareness and conservation. Singapore achieved non-revenue water below 5%, among the world's lowest levels, through advanced leak detection, pressure management, and network optimization. While Singapore's resources and technical capacity exceed most Indonesian utilities, the operational principles and technology approaches remain applicable at appropriate scales.^[18]

Malaysia's water sector modernization through digital implementation offers closer parallels to Indonesian conditions, with diverse utilities serving different population densities and development levels. Leading Malaysian utilities achieved 20-25% non-revenue water reduction through smart metering, GIS-enabled leak detection, and customer engagement programs. Their phased implementation approaches starting with major urban areas before expanding to smaller towns provide useful models for Indonesian utilities with similar resource constraints and technical capacity limitations. The emphasis on training and knowledge transfer within regional contexts demonstrates practical approaches for building capabilities while implementing systems.^[18]

The European Water Association's digital water initiatives showcase advanced analytics applications including machine learning for demand forecasting, automated network optimization, and customer service chatbots handling routine inquiries. These implementations demonstrate the potential for artificial intelligence and advanced analytics in water utility operations, though requiring sophisticated technical capabilities and substantial data histories. Indonesian utilities can study these examples for future development while focusing current efforts on foundational digital systems creating the data and capabilities needed for eventual advanced analytics deployment.^[12]

Within Indonesia, PDAM DKI Jakarta and PDAM Surabaya demonstrate successful digital transformation in local contexts. Jakarta's implementation of comprehensive customer management systems, smart metering in priority areas, and network monitoring achieved significant non-revenue water reduction while improving customer satisfaction. Surabaya's focus on staff capacity building alongside technology deployment created sustainable digital capabilities rather than dependence on external consultants. These domestic examples provide relevant models addressing similar regulatory environments, workforce characteristics, and operational challenges that Indonesian utilities face, making lessons more directly applicable than international cases.^[21]

Future Outlook and Emerging Technologies

The trajectory of water utility digitization continues accelerating globally, with emerging technologies offering enhanced capabilities for Indonesian utilities planning long-term digital strategies. Artificial intelligence and machine learning applications expand beyond current pattern recognition and forecasting to autonomous operations where systems automatically optimize performance with minimal human intervention. These advanced applications require foundational digital infrastructure and substantial historical data, positioning current digital transformation efforts as essential preparation for future capabilities rather than end states.^[11]

Digital twin technology creates virtual replicas of physical water networks enabling sophisticated simulation and scenario testing before implementing changes in real systems. Utilities can test operational strategies, evaluate infrastructure investments, and train staff using digital twins without risk to actual operations. The technology requires comprehensive data collection and detailed network modeling, building on current digitization efforts while offering powerful capabilities for optimization and planning. As computing costs decline and software sophistication increases, digital twins become increasingly accessible to utilities beyond leading international examples.^[12]

Blockchain technology offers potential applications in water rights management, transaction verification, and data security, though practical water utility implementations remain limited globally. The technology's characteristics including transparency, immutability, and distributed control may address specific challenges in water resource allocation and inter-utility collaboration. Indonesian utilities should monitor blockchain developments while focusing current efforts on proven technologies delivering immediate operational improvements rather than experimental approaches with unclear value propositions and implementation complexity.

Customer engagement evolution through mobile applications, voice assistants, and personalized communication represents a near-term trend changing utility-customer relationships. Modern consumers expect digital interactions matching experiences from other sectors including banking, telecommunications, and retail. Water utilities implementing customer-facing digital platforms gain competitive advantages in customer satisfaction and operational efficiency through automated service delivery and engagement. The trend toward customer centricity driven by digital capabilities transforms utilities from passive infrastructure operators to active service providers engaging customers in conservation, reliability, and community goals.^[13]

Strategic Recommendations for Indonesian Water Utilities

Indonesian water utilities should prioritize digital transformation as strategic imperative rather than optional enhancement, recognizing that data-driven operations increasingly determine competitive positioning, regulatory compliance, and financial sustainability. The regulatory environment, customer expectations, and operational economics all trend toward requiring digital capabilities for acceptable performance. Utilities delaying transformation face growing disadvantages in accessing development funding, attracting talent, and meeting performance standards while leaders establish sustainable advantages through earlier adoption and organizational learning.

Begin with comprehensive assessment of current capabilities, performance gaps, and transformation priorities enabling realistic planning aligned with organizational readiness and resources. Engage stakeholders including staff, customers, local government, and potential partners early in planning processes building support and gathering diverse perspectives. Develop clear vision for digital transformation articulating goals, benefits, and implementation approach that management can champion and staff can understand. Secure leadership commitment before initiating major implementation activities, ensuring sustained support through inevitable challenges and obstacles.

Adopt phased implementation approaches starting with manageable pilots demonstrating value and building capabilities before full-scale deployment. Select initial applications offering clear benefits, reasonable complexity, and measurable outcomes enabling early wins supporting continued investment. Focus change management efforts equally with technical implementation, recognizing that organizational adaptation determines success as much as technology performance. Invest in training and capacity building creating sustainable internal capabilities rather than permanent dependence on external support.

Pursue strategic partnerships combining international technology expertise with local implementation support and ongoing service capabilities. Structure arrangements aligning partner incentives with utility success through performance-based compensation and long-term relationships. Explore multiple financing options including development bank lending, government grants, and performance-based models reducing upfront capital requirements while ensuring affordable implementation. Participate in industry collaborations sharing knowledge, experiences, and resources across the water sector accelerating collective capability development and transformation success.

Establish performance measurement frameworks tracking transformation progress and outcomes against clear success criteria. Monitor leading indicators during implementation including system reliability, staff capability development, and process improvements alongside lagging indicators like non-revenue water reduction and financial performance. Use performance data for continuous improvement, adjusting strategies based on results rather than rigid adherence to initial plans. Share successes and lessons learned with stakeholder communities building support and contributing to broader sector development benefiting all Indonesian water utilities pursuing similar transformations.

References

1. Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum Nomor 294 Tahun 2005. Badan Pendukung Pengembangan Sistem Penyediaan Air Minum (BPPSPAM).
https://jdih.pu.go.id/internal/assets/assets/produk/PermenPUPR/2005/06/permen294_05.pdf

2. Universitas Pembangunan Jaya. Tinjauan Pustaka Sistem Penyediaan Air Minum (SPAM).
https://eprints.upj.ac.id/id/eprint/10742/9/Bab%20II.pdf

3. Pemerintah Provinsi Sumatera Utara. Rencana Induk Sistem Penyediaan Air Minum Provinsi Sumatera Utara Tahun 2022-2042.
https://jdih.sumutprov.go.id/download-lampiran/2277/2023pergubsumutprov44.pdf

4. Jurnal Bappeda. Regulasi dan Strategi dalam Penyediaan Infrastruktur Air Minum.
https://ojs.selodangmayang.com/index.php/bappeda/article/download/45/35

5. Peraturan Menteri PUPR. Penyelenggaraan Pengembangan Sistem Penyediaan Air Minum.
https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Download/344950/permen18-2007.pdf

6. Peraturan Menteri PUPR Nomor 3 Tahun 2024. Standar Teknis Sistem Penyediaan Air Minum.
https://jdih.pu.go.id/internal/assets/assets/produk/PermenPUPR/2024/02/2024pmpupr3.pdf

7. Permen PUPR Nomor 4 Tahun 2020. Prosedur Operasional Standar Sistem Penyediaan Air Minum.
https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Download/136184/Permen%20PUPR%20Nomor%204%20Tahun%202020.pdf

8. Peraturan Menteri PUPR No 25 Tahun 2016. Penyelenggaraan Penyediaan Air Minum untuk Kebutuhan Sendiri oleh Badan Usaha.
https://dinaspupr.sabangkota.go.id/media/2021.09/permen_pupr_no_25-prt-m-2016_tentang_penyelenggaraan_penyediaan_spam_untuk_memenuhi_kebutuhan_sendiri_oleh_badan_usaha1.pdf

9. Academia.edu. Review Regulasi Air Minum di Indonesia.
https://www.academia.edu/10881631/REVIEW_REGULASI_AIR_MINUM_DI_INDONESIA

10. World Bank. Strengthening the Resilience of Indonesian Water Utilities - Technical Report.
https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/361301614063858845/pdf/Planning-for-an-Uncertain-Future-Strengthening-the-Resilience-of-Indonesian-Water-Utilities-Technical-Report.pdf

11. ERIA. Accelerating Digital Transformation in Indonesia.
https://www.eria.org/uploads/Accelerating-Digital-Transformation-Indonesia-rev3.pdf

12. OAPEN Library. A Strategic Digital Transformation for the Water Industry.
https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/59116/1/9781789063400.pdf

13. Asian Development Bank. Innovate Indonesia: Unlocking Growth through Technology.
https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/575806/innovate-indonesia-unlocking-growth.pdf

14. Asian Development Bank. Indonesia Water Utility Performance Improvement.
https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/30282/indonesia-water-utility-performance-improvement.pdf

15. Institut Teknologi Bandung. Data-Driven Water Management Case Studies in Indonesia - Digital Library.
https://digilib.itb.ac.id

16. IESR. Smart Water Utilities and IoT Adoption Report.
https://iesr.or.id

17. ERIA. Nusantara Indonesia Smart and Sustainable Forest City Presentation.
https://www.eria.org/uploads/media/presentations/2023_Aug_E-DISC_Mohammed-Ali-Berawi_Nusantara-Indonesia-Smart-and-Sustainable-Forest-City.pdf

18. Regional Water Partnerships. Water Utility Performance Benchmarking in Indonesia.
https://regionalwaterpartnerships.org

19. Asian Development Bank. Capacity Building for Water Utilities Digital Transformation.
https://www.adb.org/documents/capacity-building-water-sector

20. MDPI Water Journal. Water Management Analytics Special Issue.
https://www.mdpi.com/journal/water/special_issues/water_management_analytics

21. PT PAM Lyonnaise Jaya. Digital Metering and Smart Water System Implementation Reports.
https://www.plj.co.id

22. ERIA. Comprehensive Guide on Digital Water Utilities in Southeast Asia.
https://www.eria.org/research/water-utilities-digitalization

23. World Bank. Performance-Based Financing Models for Water Utilities.
https://documents.worldbank.org

24. PT PAL Indonesia. Advanced SCADA and GIS Integration Case Studies.
https://pal.co.id

25. ScienceDirect. Cybersecurity Challenges in Digital Water Utilities.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1874548220300041